EU AI Act readiness

Map your decision posture onto the AI Act articles a regulator asks about

Same engine, same numbers as the Decionis Score — different vocabulary. The five score dimensions map cleanly onto Articles 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 & 17 of the EU AI Act, with a downloadable executive packet a conformity assessment can reference by hash, not by PDF.

Run the assessment View sample AI Act packet

The sample packet uses the default seed posture; your assessment generates a packet from your real inputs.

Sample AI Act readiness

Article 9 + 12 ready

Decionis Score 70/100 (Operational)

Sample

Risk-management cadence and logging are operational. Next focus: turn on the human-oversight loop (Article 14) and at least one transparency primitive (Article 13).

This score corresponds to operational AI Act posture: Article 9 continuous risk-management cadence and Article 12 logging are live, with signed Decision Dossiers as the audit-grade event log. Deployer-grade (Articles 13 & 14) is one human-oversight loop and one transparency primitive away.

Score dimensions → AI Act articles

Every dimension of the Decionis Score has a direct mapping to one or more articles of the AI Act. The executive packet exports each dimension annotated with its article reference, so a conformity assessment can cite signed Decisions Dossiers by article instead of by policy document.

Logging cadence Article 12 (logging) · Article 19 (record-keeping): Article 12 requires automated logs of high-risk AI system events. Signed dossier volume is the operational evidence that logging is actually happening — not just documented.
Risk management coverage Article 9 (risk management) · Article 15 (accuracy & robustness): Article 9 mandates a continuous risk management process across the AI system lifecycle. Coverage of high-blast-radius actions is the auditable surface that proves risk identification reaches the actions a regulator cares about.
Policy & conformity Article 16 (provider obligations) · Article 17 (quality management): Article 16/17 require a documented quality-management system mapped to the system's purpose. Verified policy packs are the encoded conformity layer that a conformity assessment can reference by hash, not by PDF.
Human oversight Article 14 (human oversight): Article 14 requires effective oversight by natural persons during the period the AI system is in use. Approval pings are the measurable human-in-the-loop surface that satisfies oversight in production — not just in onboarding.
Post-market monitoring & transparency Article 13 (transparency) · Article 61 (post-market monitoring): Article 13 + 61 require providers to make information available to deployers and to monitor performance after launch. Public verify links, audit rooms, and signed proof are the three primitives that make this practical instead of paperwork.

Get your own packet

Run the 5-input assessment, then export an AI Act readiness packet you can hand straight to a regulator, a notified body, or whoever is asking.

Run the assessment Generate a signed Decision Dossier