Decionis

Concept

Approval Evidence

Auditors increasingly ask for proof that a process was enforced by the system rather than followed by a person. Evidence assembled afterwards — a screenshot of a settings screen, a message in a channel treated as sign-off, logs stitched together at audit time — answers a weaker question, because it can be edited and it records what happened rather than what was permitted. A record produced by the check itself, while it ran, answers the question as it was asked.

How do I prove an automated action was actually approved?

Auditors increasingly ask for proof that a process was enforced by the system rather than followed by a person. Evidence assembled afterwards — a screenshot of a settings screen, a message in a channel treated as sign-off, logs stitched together at audit time — answers a weaker question, because it can be edited and it records what happened rather than what was permitted. A record produced by the check itself, while it ran, answers the question as it was asked.

Where this fits

Decionis is the deterministic decision layer between intent and execution. This concept is one way in; the architecture behind it is the same in every case.

Why Decionis existsHow the protocol worksGlossary