The Decionis Index
Every figure here is measured, aggregated across organisations, and published only above a privacy threshold. Where we cannot measure something yet, it is listed as unmeasured rather than estimated.
Aggregated across at least 3 organisations. Each figure is counted at the action, not estimated from it.
1,036
last 30 days
Actions that were not permitted to run as requested — the ones a report would have described afterwards.
$0
last 30 days
Monetary value of actions refused or held. Counted at the amount on the action, not an estimate of consequence.
These are instrumented, but the source returned nothing for this window. Shown as absent rather than as zero — they are different claims.
Listed openly, with what measuring each would require. These are the figures the Index is missing, not figures it is withholding.
Which executable policy teams fork most often.
Needs — Fork and copy telemetry on the Policy Exchange. The catalogue is public and unauthenticated by design, so this needs counting without identifying who copied.
Which policy is being adopted fastest week over week.
Needs — A retained time series of per-policy adoption; today only current totals exist.
How long an escalated action waits for the authority it needs. Distinct from time saved — this is the cost of escalation, not its benefit.
Needs — Escalation open-to-resolution timestamps. Time saved is measured today; the wait itself is not.
Every figure is derived from decisions the protocol actually took, each carried in a signed Decision Dossier that can be verified independently. The methodology behind the monetary figures — including what it deliberately does not claim — is published separately.
Prevented-loss methodologyPublic drift dashboardA signed dossierThe Learning Loop