Decionis
Architecture comparison · Security gateway

Decionis vs Lasso MCP security gateway

An MCP security gateway inspects traffic at a proxy; an execution authority binds permission to the proposed action and records signed evidence.

Public sources checked . Our architectural assessment follows the scope of the sources below. Send a correction; accepted corrections update this date.

When is Lasso MCP security gateway the better choice?

  • Your problem is inspection of MCP traffic.
  • You need a gateway in front of MCP servers.
  • Content-layer threat controls are the immediate requirement.
  • A gateway's controls and your logs already meet your evidence needs.

Basis: Lasso MCP gateway announcement

What changes at the execution boundary?

DimensionDecionisLasso MCP security gateway
Control boundaryOne exact action, with authority re-evaluated immediately before commit.Lasso's open-source MCP gateway announcement describes a security layer between agents and MCP servers, with inspection and policy enforcement.
EvidenceSigned Decision Dossier; verify the covered artifacts with the appropriate public keys, without an account.That announcement does not describe a per-decision artifact with offline public-key verification. It is not an inventory of every capability in Lasso's current portfolio.
Deployment responsibilityThe integrating host must isolate credentials, prevent bypass and enforce the decision.Evaluate the chosen deployment and its enforcement boundary; a product category is not evidence of a specific installation.
Procurement postureEd25519-signed Decision Dossiers · single-use execution grants. These pages compare engineering and architecture, not certifications; current audit status is on the Trust Center.Obtain current assurance documents and check the service and deployment they cover.

Decionis contract: enforce-and-bind, claim-before-commit and finalize. Signature validity is separate from execution eligibility and downstream effect confirmation.

Can these controls work together?

A gateway can inspect a call before an execution authority evaluates it. Confirm the integration; neither a proxy nor a signed record alone establishes complete deployment security.

Check the evidence

Verify this yourself — no account, works offline

This preloaded dossier has real Ed25519 signatures over synthetic data from the public Agent-Safe corpus. Its test key is deliberately public. It demonstrates verification and tamper detection; it is not customer evidence, a production signature, or permission to execute.

Ready to check locally

npx -y @decionis/verify --file OwnedExecutionBound.json --jwks Jwks.json

After the page or files load, the signature checks need no network. Installing the CLI may require a connection. Valid signatures establish integrity relative to the selected key, not whether the original facts were true.

Sources and scope

A capability not described in the cited public material may still exist. This is a technical comparison of documented controls, not a claim of exhaustive vendor testing.