Decionis vs Zenity
Zenity covers an agent estate before, during and after execution. Decionis concentrates on an exact action's authority and portable evidence.
Public sources checked . Our architectural assessment follows the scope of the sources below. Send a correction; accepted corrections update this date.
When is Zenity the better choice?
- You need to discover agents across an organization.
- You need posture and exposure management.
- You need detection and response across SaaS, cloud and endpoints.
- Estate-wide coverage is more important than the narrow authority boundary considered here.
Basis: Zenity platform
What changes at the execution boundary?
| Dimension | Decionis | Zenity |
|---|---|---|
| Control boundary | One exact action, with authority re-evaluated immediately before commit. | Zenity explicitly describes Surface, Enforce and Protect, including agent discovery, posture, runtime intervention and detection. It is not a visibility-only product. |
| Evidence | Signed Decision Dossier; verify the covered artifacts with the appropriate public keys, without an account. | The reviewed platform page describes security and governance controls; it does not specify a downloadable per-action dossier that can be checked offline against public keys. |
| Deployment responsibility | The integrating host must isolate credentials, prevent bypass and enforce the decision. | Evaluate the chosen deployment and its enforcement boundary; a product category is not evidence of a specific installation. |
| Procurement posture | Ed25519-signed Decision Dossiers · single-use execution grants. These pages compare engineering and architecture, not certifications; current audit status is on the Trust Center. | Obtain current assurance documents and check the service and deployment they cover. |
Decionis contract: enforce-and-bind, claim-before-commit and finalize. Signature validity is separate from execution eligibility and downstream effect confirmation.
Can these controls work together?
Use estate-wide security findings as inputs to action policy where an integration supports it. Request an evidence export in a technical evaluation; do not infer an absent capability from one public page.
Check the evidence
Verify this yourself — no account, works offline
This preloaded dossier has real Ed25519 signatures over synthetic data from the public Agent-Safe corpus. Its test key is deliberately public. It demonstrates verification and tamper detection; it is not customer evidence, a production signature, or permission to execute.
Ready to check locally
npx -y @decionis/verify --file OwnedExecutionBound.json --jwks Jwks.json
After the page or files load, the signature checks need no network. Installing the CLI may require a connection. Valid signatures establish integrity relative to the selected key, not whether the original facts were true.
Sources and scope
- Zenity platform · checked 2026-09-16
A capability not described in the cited public material may still exist. This is a technical comparison of documented controls, not a claim of exhaustive vendor testing.